Question for discussion
Based on the above conversation discuss, with examples and justification whether the following statement is justified.
'A square is a rhombus but a rhombus is not a square'.
A rhombus is a quadrilateral whose four sides are all congruent A square is a quadrilateral whose four sides are all congruent and whose angles are all right angles In other words, A square is a rhombus that is also a rectangle These are both rhombuses: +--------+ | | +--------+ | | / / | | / / | | / / +--------+ +--------+ But only this is a square: +--------+ | | | | | | | | +--------+
Something went wrong when I posted onto the blog and I had named it the wrong question. Sorry.
ReplyDelete