Question for discussionBased on the above conversation discuss, with examples and justification whether the following statement is justified.
'A square is a rhombus but a rhombus is not a square'.
A rhombus is a quadrilateral whose four sides are all congruent.
A square is a quadrilateral whose four sides are all congruent and whose angles are all right angles.
In other words, a square is a rhombus that is also a rectangle.
The above two quadrilateral are both rhombuses but the four sided, with vertex of 90 degrees is a square, not a rhombus: