Question for discussion
Based on the above conversation discuss, with examples and justification whether the following statement is justified.
'A square is a rhombus but a rhombus is not a square'.
A rhombus is a quadrilateral whose four sides are all congruent.
A square is a quadrilateral whose four sides are all congruent and whose angles are all right angles.
In other words, a square is a rhombus that is also a rectangle.
The above two quadrilateral are both rhombuses but the four sided, with vertex of 90 degrees is a square, not a rhombus:
I have named this post by the wrong question thus I have changed my mistake in the next post (Question 1 By Looi Wei Chern). Thanks
ReplyDelete